Faucet Repair

30 May 2026

Was introduced to Mirak Jamal's work for the first time via his show A Guest is a Blessing at Rose Easton. Has been a while since I've been so inspired by something. I remember listening to an interview with Thom Yorke once where he cited Neil Young as an artist who gave him permission (in his case to sing in his naturally wonky falsetto), and I feel similarly about Jamal.

His approach to painting has kicked a door open for me that is revealing something that has always been there. Something alive through the combination of the essence of a perception via color fields and care taken to animate choice details within those fields, both imagined and real, that might otherwise disappear into the blurred fringes of vision/memory. Not for detail's sake, but for the sake of preserving small, potent truths. I think I sense a kindred spirit in his nomadic background as well.

Through my research I've gleaned that he has an ongoing creative dialogue/relationship with his father, the artist Mohsen Jamal. In 2019, Mirak had a show titled BEST VIEW IN TOWN at Kunsthall Oslo that presented a body of work alongside/in response to work by his father, in particular a 1986 landscape of Römerberg, a village where the Jamal family had first settled in Germany after fleeing revolutionary Iran.

I bring this up because the press release for that show, written by Mirak himself, is a really wonderful piece of writing that exemplifies some values I hold dear. I'm including it in full here. There's more to say about his paintings and how they're propelling me forward, but for now this just needs to exist on its own. To be loved is to be known, yes, but I think it also has a lot to do with mutual respect.

Let us begin with the most apparent: a mixed-media drawing on paper depicting a landscape. Holding the single-sheet, we attest to a fleeting materiality, which could have come from a transportable aquarelle block containing many more works. Removed from context, its singularity leaves us in a predicament, and with a carte blanche for infinite ponder! Some things are obvious: the sheet in question has summoned a multitude of media treatments ranging from colored-penciled details and scruffy oil- pastel marks to broad acrylic strokes, and a pervasive watercolor atmosphere. Alongside the pleasant treatment of color we note a practical tone, and a hastiness of execution that is evidence of a hand confident to capture “life as is.” The content does not strike us as a revelation, nor a spectacle to swoon large audiences, rather, it seems to be true to common life, and convinces elegantly in this uncelebrated feat. The motivation for such work could have been the offspring to a simple desire to seize a pleasant day. The clear sky above is an indication of this at the least. Whether the painting was done in leisure, as an exercise in style, or as part of some larger endeavor we leave motivations aside for the moment.

In the foreground a barren land covered with generous washes of green and brown pulls us into a picture of possibilities. Beyond it, the artist steers our pupils to rest on the horizon line – conventionally so. Here, an unremarkable town has shyly tucked itself away behind some trimmings. We squint to survey the elements: a modestly-sized apartment building or town hall with reassuring angular architecture, a trail of miscellaneous bushes and trees that wall some vaguely discernible family houses, and the faint town church that sinks into a purple mist – projecting its omnipresence slightly above the rest of the rabble. This accumulated sort recalls an ordinary place; with an affirmation towards all things structured and orderly, as is standard for any ordinary place. Clues drawn from the inherent architectural characteristics and the surrounding landscape lead us to posit a potential geography. Any other setting than Germany is inconceivable. Emboldened by our conclusion, our thoughts trail off past the hermetics of the picture frame to a larger vicinity of endlessly ploughed fields of the greatest agricultural merit. The excursion takes us to encounters with astonishingly tall walls of evergreens that intimidate and awe. Here lays the inspiration to all things Gothic, we figure.

Snapping back to the picture at hand, our attention is drawn to the signature at the bottom left. The work is accredited to a “Mohsen Jamal”, dating to 1986. We successfully decipher the apparent! Having been given as a clue nothing more than a name with a strange ring to it, we determine to carry our guesswork about the origins of this drawing through to its very creator. From the prompt naturalism of the outdoor scene, we deduce that the work could have taken place en plein air. What could have led the artist to such a place; such a small town in the middle of Germany? Did the landscape hold a personal value? Could a small place such as this have had enough historical or collective significance to draw a faraway visit? While one may speculate further in light of these propositions (to paint a complete picture), the scenarios leave us with the sense that the work was produced by a curious passerby, a newly arrived or a guest, on a spontaneous whim to capture the unfamiliar. Whereas what someone predisposed, or cynical, to a ubiquitous setting would dismiss as mundane, holds intrigue to a fresh eye. Contrary to our prejudice, it remains plausible that this town could have been the vested habitat of a local; the proper terroir of the artist indeed.

Having entered the picture plane, we come to appreciate the view accompanied by the fragrance of a countryside unhindered by noise pollution and cosmopolitan combustion. Transfixed, inhabiting the gaze of the artist, the discrepancy between our observation-deck at the easel's foot, and that of a withdrawn life in the distance is given neither face nor form. Shafts of windows reveal vignettes of the inner mechanisms of a town, where typical exchanges, contested relationships, and neighborly feuds abound. What separates us from yonder then, is the plateau of land that determines the cautionary distance between the viewer (brush in hand, holding sway of history-making), between spectator and the subject in the periphery, between civilization and the uncharted wild – observed as if from the trenches. Still, the village is likely unaware of our existence on the fringes. Nonetheless it is here, by the same tree that offered the artist a cool shade on a sunny day in 1986, that we hold the fruit shaped like a globe, which when held at different angles glistens with infinite possibilities.


28 May 2026

Began an 8x10” painting today, a plume of smoke on a ledge redux. After trying to work with it a few months ago, I came back to the image I still remember from when I visited Rob's studio in Sag Harbor and he showed me an acid-yellow work that featured the same subject. It's a beautiful idea, an explosion confined to a container in a quiet room (and no one is around to hear it...). I think I already prefer this one to my initial attempt, firstly for the size—the implication of large-scale destruction works better small. Christopher Culver's charcoal and pastel drawing Octobers (2025) of a white bird in flight approaching a domestic windowsill to land has been tacked up in my studio while I've been working on this one. For the lovely color harmonies, but also because I think there is a lot to be learned from him about subtle texturing of monochromatic space. There's also a tonal parallel to the content; alarming, aggressive action framed and frozen into a kind of tranquility.


26 May 2026

Have been spending a lot of time looking at Paul Klee's Strange Garden (1923), a watercolor on gessoed fabric mounted on cardboard, flora and fauna and mask-faces woven together by line and color and texture. A quilted feeling almost, but not patchwork. A scene both stacked and embedded in such a nice way. Basically every month or so, a new work of his gets stuck next to wherever I'm storing what I see. This one has come along at the right time; it does everything my studio seems to be trying to make possible at the moment. Establishes a kind of fundamental soil that the image and the feeling and the memory all grow from together and hover over at the same time. A condition that allows for forms to remain abstract in relation to what they comprise while threatening the opposite. But I'm also wary of thinking of that too much as an end while working. Or thinking about that at all. It's just an enjoyable place to begin right now.


24 May 2026

Stadium (working title): in Hastings we walked around an arcade, and there was a claw machine filled with hundreds of shiny golden eggs. A disorienting sea of metallic surfaces and reflected neon. One particular egg was angled towards another game in the room, a basketball one I think—a structure contained by netting, which burst open and stretched out like arms in the convex reflection. Pieces of that image bounced around the rest of the pile, but none cohered into anything as loud as the scene in/on that single egg. Tried to paint that. Handled the paint pretty well and felt good about the surface preparation and color, but nothing of interesting note transpired. And it veered a little too close to the kind of correctness via highlight painting that I despise. I’m aiming to go softer and softer into the recesses of forms, but part of me is still holding on to hard edges and I need to let go of them. So this one will probably meet its maker, but may be reconstituted elsewhere. Regardless, it did feel nice to move paint around again after traveling for a few days.


22 May 2026

A painting: that is maybe 80-90% logically sequenced but with relief-printed elements introduced at one point in the process and reacted to, with forms delineated entirely with dashes, of a measured and almost illustrated flat environment containing one shape that becomes the lone source of depth, of a flattened scene that nonetheless attempts to adhere to the logic of atmospheric perspective in spite of itself, of a materially fluid orbiting scene that stops short of penetrating a central void space (white), of an activated axis like a melon cut in half and presented as a whole, of the light of death as a very small thing.


20 May 2026

Upper crust (working title): rubber ducks becoming animated towards a source/void. That began as a plug. I've been pretty stuck on a Graham Little gouache on paper painting from 2021 of a squirrel called Untitled (Squirrel) this week. Apparently he found a dead squirrel while cycling and kept it in his freezer for three years.

In the work the animal is on the left of the composition encircled by its own tail, peacefully at some kind of rest. There's a transparent triangle shape floating over or on part of the squirrel, looks like something cut out from one of those geometry templates required for high school math classes. It's connected by two thin lines pulled taut across the work that criss-cross into a little cluster of smaller triangles connected to tiny trompe-l'oeil nails; the effect is something like miniature barricade tape. Then just above those, there are sort of clumsily calligraphic marks that wind their way up to an ornamental glass object with a pine cone looking head that might be a stirrer or needle or pin. The feeling of the whole thing is something close to what I remember from seeing the Pietà in Rome. Delicacy in death. That's a heck of a comparison, I know, but it's the first thing that came to mind. Dürer's watercolors of animals too, of course.

Anyway, these ducks I went for were not destined for that kind of accuracy. There's been a desire recently to create a kind of generative soup, boil it, and then catch the bubbles before they pop to comprise the image. But I have to be careful not to create this environment for no reason. It could be that the next one causes a counter-reaction through rendering.


18 May 2026

Some bits to get down from the most recent courthouse crit group: containment, levels of estrangement, Hallmark card framing, octogenarian colors, Bonnard's pocket calendar, Allen Ginsberg: return to the optical, fuddy-duddy speed, head swims, I own a human skeleton, tiny canvas big brush, In the Night Kitchen, elephant-wise.


16 May 2026

Saw the Duchamp show at MoMA while I was in New York. Master puppeteer, seems like he operated with such an unfathomably wide top-down view of his context that he transcended it entirely. A pretty amazing feeling to walk chronologically through the unmatchably rigorous, curious, and poetic path he charted. I got the sense that his constant iterating on the forms he obsessed over was his way of rotating them around a kind of internalized examination axis to spatially project and then destabilize their measurable characteristics. Which generated a metaphysical language that allowed him to endlessly probe how objects relate to each other and to us as seeing and sensing bodies. In space, in time, in the imagination. And that language, seen in its entirety, felt surprisingly generous. I think because it was always pointed inward. Used to satisfy something that may have manifested as a disruption because of how original it was, but was meant to expand rather than sabotage. That's a long way of saying he was ahead of his time and was graceful in proving/sharing that.

Some personal favorite moments: one of his small Rotoreliefs—cerulean blue/white/a kind of tangerine orange, the central form a hook-shaped line-drawn half light bulb with dashes shooting off of it as implied light rays. Delicate, alive, absent of the thing it represents yet conjuring it all the same. And a 1956 small ink drawing of a jacket on two pieces of what looked like transparent tracing paper, his tiny handwritten name on the topmost piece floating over the space representing where the name tag would be on the bottom piece. The inner lining of the jacket represented by grids drawn on to that same bottom layer—simple suspension, non-duality in one choice. To say nothing of the Swift Nudes (escaping, illuminating, darting, receding). The dynamism exceeded my expectations, and they were lofty.


14 May 2026

Paul Thek @ Galerie Buchholz (NY): didn't get to make the big Pace show because it wasn't open on the one day I had free to walk around, but I'm guessing it had the lion's share of the good stuff. Even so, it was worth seeing for the new-to-me 1973 series of collaborative collages he made with Ann Wilson. I believe there were five of them, each organized around a central triangle shape. One filled with a cloudy blue sky that bled into a bird form, another filled with gold leaf, another framing a sea horizon. Diaristic in approach and feeling, lyrics (Beatles) and sections of religious texts scrawled along the edges of the triangles or floating around them, line drawings of animals cut out and dropped in here and there (a sheep with the words “kiss me” next to its face). Refreshing in its playfulness, a collaborative game. Felt like two friends trying to out-mantra each other. Perhaps they resonated with me because of the “inscrutable spiritual symbol” stuff I've been trying my hand at (as described by Jonathan). Also enjoyed the two 1975 “Untitled (Grapes)” newspaper paintings. Done seemingly so “correctly” (and directly), but handled with such an abundant and loose hand that they break down in the good way on close inspection. In one of them, a moment where the thick green vine squiggles part like curtains to reveal a shape that looks like a curling cartoon shrub underneath.


12 May 2026

Tethering (working title): revisited the bench subject, as my first attempt didn't really do it for me in the end when I got fresh eyes on it yesterday. As nice as the worked-in color was optically, there's just something about the physical quality of really thick, built-up paint that I'm repelled by in my own work (not in the work of others who do it well, to be clear). I guess it has something to do with preserving intentionality, lightness of touch, sensitivity, etc. Anyway, iterating on/coming back to subjects has been something of a game changer for me; something that being in my own space surrounded by my reoccurring thoughts has catalyzed. Slowly getting over the disappointment that accompanies an idea that doesn't reach its potential and learning to take instructions from it on new iterations instead. This time I focused a lot more on repetitive touch and constant subtraction, reminded me a bit of how it felt to handle the paint that made Destruction as well as building—never letting it settle or cover too much space, always making more marks and negating those marks over and over again. This one does feel like it got pretty close to something inherent to the visually disorienting quality that made the bench's anatomy appealing in the first place, but I gave it a border that ended up connecting to the bench's rail in a similar way to the last time I tried, which felt a bit gimmicky. But that could possibly be negated as well with a simple bisecting line in pencil or a slight tweak in the transition from the border to the rail, so we'll see if it can be resolved. A lasting image of Max Keene's wonderful piece World Dance (2025) has been going around the city with me in my mind this week.